Operations audit
1–2 weeks. Workflow map with time and cost per step, a ranked list of what is automatable, and build estimates for each. Credited in full against a build.
Undervolting runs a system at lower power and loses nothing. We do it to operations: find the work burning hours for no reason, and replace it with software that runs quietly underneath.
Almost nobody does.
The capability is sitting there, free or close to it, and most teams still do the work by hand. Not because they are lazy, and not because the tools are bad.
Because nobody on staff wants to be the person who bets a real process on something they do not understand yet. That hesitation is the entire gap.
The same chip, running the same clock speed, drawing less power. Not slower. Not throttled. The headroom was always there, wasted as heat, because nobody tuned it.
In an office the axes change and the shape does not. Same work out. Far fewer hours in.
When the work is manual, cost rises in lockstep with volume. Undervolting breaks that coupling. Output keeps climbing. Cost stops following.
Model: 8 minutes of human handling per item at a $38 loaded hourly cost, with an overtime and rework penalty above 1,500 items. Undervolted: 1.2 minutes of human approval per item plus $1,800 a month to run and maintain the system. Adjust all of it on the call.
I spent my career in mortgage operations, and the last several years building the software that runs it: a borrower-facing application portal, pricing and sign-off tooling, document intake with automated review, and integrations across loan origination systems, Microsoft 365 and SharePoint. Production systems, real customers, real auditors.
That work was in lending, and almost none of it was about lending. It was about documents arriving in the wrong format, systems that refuse to talk to each other, and capable people spending their day as the integration layer. Every industry has that problem.
I started Undervolt Labs because the tools to fix it are already here, and what stops most teams is not capability. It is that nobody wants to be the person who bets a real process on something they do not understand yet. I have already been that person, somewhere the output had to be right and someone was going to check it afterward.
One to two weeks watching how the work actually happens, not how the process document says it happens. You get a written map either way. If you go ahead with a build, the fee comes off it in full.
1–2 weeks. Workflow map with time and cost per step, a ranked list of what is automatable, and build estimates for each. Credited in full against a build.
One system, built and shipped into your environment against your real data. Fixed scope, fixed price, agreed before anything starts. Source and documentation are yours.
Monitoring, fixes, and a queue of small changes as your process changes. Optional. What we build is yours to run without us.
Thirty minutes, no charge. Bring the number above and we will pressure-test it together.